Published: Vol 7, Iss 23, Dec 5, 2017 DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.2643 Views: 9600
Reviewed by: Emilie BesnardFei XiaoJose Antonio Reyes-Darias
Protocol Collections
Comprehensive collections of detailed, peer-reviewed protocols focusing on specific topics
Related protocols
Isolation and Culture of Primary Fibroblasts from Neonatal Murine Hearts to Study Cardiac Fibrosis
Shweta Kumar [...] Nagalingam Ravi Sundaresan
Feb 20, 2023 1023 Views
Protein Pull-down Assay Using HiBiT-tag-dependent Luciferase Activity Measurement
Masashi Arakawa and Eiji Morita
Mar 20, 2023 716 Views
Methods to Quantify the Dynamic Recycling of Plasma Membrane Channels
Rawad Hodeify and Khaled Machaca
Sep 5, 2023 510 Views
Abstract
Cellular infection with tick-borne flaviviruses (TBFVs) results in activation of the interferon (IFN) signaling pathway and subsequent upregulation of numerous genes termed IFN stimulated genes (ISGs) (Schoggins et al., 2011). Many ISGs function to prevent virus pathogenesis by acting in a broad or specific manner through protein-protein interactions (Duggal and Emerman, 2012). The potency of the IFN signaling response determines the outcome of TBFV infection (Best, 2017; Carletti et al., 2017). Interestingly, data from our lab show that TBFV replication is significantly restricted in cells of the reservoir species Peromyscus leucopus thereby suggesting a potent antiviral response (Izuogu et al., 2017). We assessed the relative contribution of IFN signaling to resistance in P. leucopus by knocking down a major transcription factor in the IFN response pathway. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) was specifically targeted in P. leucopus cells by shRNA technology. We further tested the impact of gene knockdown on the ability of cells to respond to IFN and restrict virus replication; the results indicate that when STAT1 expression is altered, P. leucopus cells have a decreased response to IFN stimulation and are significantly more susceptible to TBFV replication.
Keywords: InterferonBackground
IFN signaling is the first line of defense against flaviviruses invading a host cell (Robertson et al., 2009; Lazear and Diamond, 2015). Molecular signatures associated with the virus particles are detected by pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) which then elicit downstream signaling via transcription factors to release type 1 IFNs from the cell (Kawai and Akira, 2011; Loo and Gale, 2011). Further, the IFN response pathway is initiated by binding of IFN-beta (IFN-β) to its cognate receptor and activation of the JAK-STAT signaling cascade (Loo et al., 2008). STAT1 is a major player in the IFN response pathway and functions within a complex to activate the IFN–stimulated response element (ISRE) promoter in the nucleus (Stark et al., 1998). Ultimately, IFN signaling transcriptionally upregulates numerous host genes that act to curtail infection and limit viral pathogenesis (Liu et al., 2011).
TBFVs contribute to the global burden of disease by causing encephalitis or hemorrhagic fevers in infected individuals. There are about 10,000 cases of TBE annually and disease is endemic to Europe and parts of Asia (Suss, 2008). In recent years, TBFVs have shown emerging nature due to their occurrence in previously unreported regions and re-occurrence in areas of eradication (Robertson et al., 2009; Ebel, 2010). The reason for the increased spread is not known, and treatment for clinically-recognized cases is limited to palliative care (Fernandez-Garcia et al., 2009; Lani et al., 2014). While virus infection in humans and other susceptible species can result in deleterious illness, infection of a natural reservoir host P. leucopus remains asymptomatic (Telford et al., 1997; Santos et al., 2016) suggesting that the host could lack relevant proviral factors or express effective antiviral factors. Data from our lab has explored these possibilities and demonstrated that viral restriction in P. leucopus cells is mediated by an antiviral response occurring via the IFN signaling cascade (Izuogu et al., 2017). Our studies involved resolving the sequence of antiviral gene homologs in P. leucopus and targeting components of the IFN response pathway. Specifically, our study first showed that STAT1 expression was consistently higher in P. leucopus cells compared to the susceptible control M. musculus following IFN treatment and virus infection (Izuogu et al., 2017). Based on these data, we further assessed the relative role of STAT1 in virus restriction by specific gene knockdown. This protocol describes the technique used to design shRNA to target STAT1, packaging into lentiviruses and cellular transduction to establish P. leucopus stable cell lines with diminished STAT1 expression. We further provide details of how these cells were assayed for a loss of restriction following infection with a TBFV, Langat virus (LGTV).
Materials and Reagents
Equipment
Software
Procedure
Data analysis
All titration experiments were performed three times in triplicates. Data were analyzed by an unpaired t-test or Mann-Whitney U test using GraphPad Prism 6 software as described in Izuogu et al., 2017 (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0179781).
Notes
Recipes
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by a pilot grant funding from the Lyme Disease Association and the University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences startup funds (RTT). The protocol and the representative results shown herein were adapted from our published work (Taylor et al., 2011; Izuogu et al., 2017). We thank Dr. Jason Munshi-South and Dr. Stephen Harris for their help in generating the initial nucleotide hits that were used to resolve the STAT1 sequence in P. leucopus. We declare no conflicting or competing interests.
References
Article Information
Publication history
Accepted: Oct 29, 2017
Published: Dec 5, 2017
Copyright
© 2017 The Authors; exclusive licensee Bio-protocol LLC.
How to cite
Izuogu, A. O. and Taylor, R. T. (2017). Lentiviral Knockdown of Transcription Factor STAT1 in Peromyscus leucopus to Assess Its Role in the Restriction of Tick-borne Flaviviruses. Bio-protocol 7(23): e2643. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.2643.
Category
Microbiology > Microbe-host interactions > Virus
Immunology > Host defense > Murine
Cell Biology > Cell signaling > Intracellular Signaling
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Tips for asking effective questions
+ Description
Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.
Share
Bluesky
X
Copy link