Published: Vol 10, Iss 7, Apr 5, 2020 DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.3582 Views: 3416
Reviewed by: David PaulMoona HuttunenAnonymous reviewer(s)
Protocol Collections
Comprehensive collections of detailed, peer-reviewed protocols focusing on specific topics
Related protocols
A Protocol for Simple, Rapid, and Direct Detection of SARS-CoV-2 from clinical samples, using Reverse Transcribed Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (RT-LAMP)
Rawi Naddaf [...] Naama Geva-Zatorsky
Oct 20, 2020 3699 Views
Colorimetric RT-LAMP Methods to Detect Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)
Gun-Soo Park [...] Jin-Soo Maeng
Nov 5, 2020 4409 Views
A Novel PCR-Based Methodology for Viral Detection Utilizing Mechanical Homogenization
Zachary P. Morehouse [...] Rodney J. Nash
Mar 5, 2022 1422 Views
Abstract
Viruses need to open, i.e., uncoat, in order to release their genomes for efficient replication and translation. Especially for non-enveloped viruses, such as enteroviruses, the cues leading to uncoating are less well known. The status of the virus has previously been observed mainly by transmission electron microscopy using negative staining, cryo electron microscopy, X-ray crystallography or gradient separation (reviewed in Tuthill et al., 2010, Myllynen et al., 2016, Ruokolainen et al., 2019). However, monitoring of uncoating has been limited by the lack of methods detecting dynamic changes of the virions. Here, we present a real-time fluorescence based protocol, which detects the viral genome (RNA) during various stages of uncoating in vitro, while RNA is still inside the particle that has been expanded before the actual RNA release, and when the RNA has been totally released from the viral particle. Our method allows to explore how various molecular factors may promote or inhibit virus uncoating.
Background
In our previous study, we found that infectious intermediate echovirus 1 particle allows SYBR Green II, a RNA intercalating dye, to enter the virus particle (Myllynen et al., 2016). This can be observed as an increase of fluorescence and the recorded fluorescence is not susceptible to RNase digestion (Myllynen et al., 2016). Using this information, we developed a real-time method to monitor virus opening using the SYBR Green II dye and RNase in fluorescence spectroscopy. We could follow the fenestration of the particles in real-time at +37 °C, or other temperature of interest, in a 96-well plate format by adding SYBR Green II and factors triggering the uncoating, and observing the increase of SYBR Green II fluorescence. Addition of RNase into parallel wells allowed us to monitor the extent of RNA release from the virions, as RNase readily degrades RNA from the solution, but not from inside of the virion (RNAse cannot enter through the small fenestrations inside to the virus particle, Myllynen et al., 2016). In case of intact virus particles, only very low amount of fluorescence was observed. As an example, in our previous study, a DPBS solution supplemented with 0.01% fatty acid free BSA produced high amounts of intermediate echovirus 1 particles. For more details see the original publication (Ruokolainen et al., 2019).
Materials and Reagents
Equipment
Software
Procedure
Data analysis
After plotting the graphs, first of all the results with the same solution with and without RNase should be compared. Fluorescence without the RNase presents the fluorescence originating from the empty and expanded particles. Fluorescence with the RNase presents the fluorescence originating from the expanded particles and the difference between the conditions with and without RNase originates from the empty capsids. Also, a measurement in virus storage buffer, or in another stabile environment for the virus, should be performed to verify the stability status of the unmodified virus, which should result in low amount of fluorescence. After comparing the measurements with and without RNase in one solution, one can also compare the results between different solutions. At least the proportion of different virus states can be compared. See Figure 2 as an example of measurements monitoring stable virus (only small increase in fluorescence), virus priming (increased fluorescence and only small decrease of signal with RNase treatment) and virus opening (increased fluorescence but loss of fluorescence after RNase addition).
When comparing the absolute fluorescence values, one must remember that the fluorescence potency of SYBR Green II might be somewhat affected by the surrounding conditions. In order to verify the proportional share of different states of the virions, other methods are recommended such as negative staining with TEM or cryo-EM.
Figure 2. Example of three cases: protective conditions where the virus stays more or less unchanged (black curves), priming conditions where the virus mainly converts to primed and expanded intermediate form (blue curves), and opening conditions where the virus releases its RNA (red curves). For each condition, the fluorescence below the dotted line originates from the expanded particles since the RNase cannot enter inside the primed or intact particles, and the fluorescence from between the solid and dotted lines originates from the externalized genomes as the RNase abolishes the fluorescence.
Notes
Depending on the reproducibility of your virus purification, different batches of purified viruses might show different degree of virus priming and opening. Especially, we observed CsCl purified virus batches to have more variability than sucrose purified. Unpurified culture supernatants contain several contaminants that probably add into background fluorescence and lower the quality of the outcome and they might have also too low a virus concentration. For the reasons mentioned above, always verify the usability of a new batch of virus with some well known controls.
Competing interests
There are no competing interests by the authors of this article.
References
Article Information
Publication history
Accepted: Feb 3, 2020
Published: Apr 5, 2020
Copyright
© 2020 The Authors; exclusive licensee Bio-protocol LLC.
How to cite
Ruokolainen, V., Laajala, M. and Marjomäki, V. (2020). Real-time Fluorescence Measurement of Enterovirus Uncoating. Bio-protocol 10(7): e3582. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.3582.
Category
Molecular Biology > RNA > RNA detection
Biochemistry > RNA > RNA-protein interaction
Biochemistry > RNA > RNA structure
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Tips for asking effective questions
+ Description
Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.
Share
Bluesky
X
Copy link